<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Digital-Sovereignty on Radical Optimist</title><link>https://radicaloptimist.org/en/tags/digital-sovereignty/</link><description>Recent content in Digital-Sovereignty on Radical Optimist</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://radicaloptimist.org/en/tags/digital-sovereignty/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>AI: The robustness imperative</title><link>https://radicaloptimist.org/en/post/ai-the-robustness-imperative/</link><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://radicaloptimist.org/en/post/ai-the-robustness-imperative/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;em>This is the third piece in a series. The first,
&lt;a href="https://radicaloptimist.org/en/post/ai-marx-was-right/">Marx Was Right About AI&lt;/a>, examined the leverage knowledge
workers hold over AI deployment during the installation period — and why that window
is closing. The second, &lt;a href="https://radicaloptimist.org/en/post/ai-the-efficiency-trap/">The Efficiency Trap&lt;/a>, traced the
monetary and ecological consequences of what happens when it closes. This piece asks
what comes after: not just what is going wrong, but what a robust alternative looks
like — for the worker, the organization, the state, and the planet.&lt;/em>&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>